Authorized for federal operation FedRAMP High VA National ATO 80M+ claims in production

For providers & health systems

Dispute defensibly.


The denial already told you what the claim needs. We read the 835, assemble the case — corrected claim, appeal, COB, records request — and hand your team a finished packet to approve. Higher overturn. Lower cost-to-collect.

Dr. Render — clinical coding agent

The realization

The 835 tells us exactly what each claim needs to get paid.

Resubmittable, appealable, records-away, COB-routing, timely-filing — each denial reason routes to a different recovery path. We sort the whole book, then build the packet for each path automatically.

where this fits 01 · the genome 02 · one claim, end to end 03 · your door — you are here 04 · the dollar returns to care

Act 01 — The read

The 835 already told us what every claim needs.

01 Recovery, collapsed

The bottleneck was never detection. It was the labor to recover.

At a 46-hospital health system, the model trained on roughly 20 million claims and surfaced tens of millions in disputable charges. The hard part wasn't finding them — it was the eight-to-sixteen hours of analyst work per case. We took that to about five minutes.

Recovery effort, per case8–16 hrs
With CuraClaims~5 min

Same button, two outputs — a finished, citable packet

  • Resubmit — corrected claim, info attachedready
  • Appeal — letter + evidence, retro-authdrafted
  • COB chase — other-payer routingrouted
Nothing auto-files. Your team approves every packet.

Act 02 — The work

Packets that survive the payer’s second look.

02 Why it holds up

9 photos, not 50,000

Pattern propagation

Review a representative sample of a claim cluster; the determination propagates to every similar claim at >0.95 proof purity. High-dollar claims always get individual review. One decision actions thousands.

Glass-box

Every packet is cited

Each recovery action carries the denial code it answers, the documentation it attaches, and the policy it invokes — so it survives the payer's second look.

Payer 360

Knows each payer

Timely-filing windows, appeal ladders, routing quirks, denial behavior — versioned by date of service and cited to source — so the packet is built the way that payer wants it.

Act 03 — The proof

Numbers from a 46-hospital book.

8–16hrs → 5min
Recovery effort per case
46-hospital system
72%
Appeal success rate
vs. 38% industry avg.
98%+
Coding accuracy at maturity
12-month deployment

Act 04 — The terms

How we engage — risk shared.

04 The terms

We get paid
when you do.

No seats. No shelfware. No report that dies in a drawer. Results as a service — the agents do the work, your people approve it, and the risk is shared.

01 · two weeks · fixed

The Read

Bring 837s + 835s. We return the recoverable pool by path — resubmit, appeal, COB, timely-filing — with provenance.

02 · contingency

Recover

The agents build, your team approves and files. We fund the work and get paid on dollars that return. No recovery, no fee.

03 · per-claim

Prevent

Deny-proof claims before they leave the building — the same genome, pointed upstream.

no seats · no backlog · finished work, signed by your team

Show me 90 days

A recovery diagnostic on your denied book.

Bring your 837/835 data. We'll show you the recoverable pool by path — resubmit, appeal, COB, timely-filing — every dollar with its provenance.